Cover V14, i04

Article

apr2005.tar

syslog

I'm fascinated by maps and all types of information visualization. I've mentioned before that one of my favorite maps is "The Internet: 01.01.00" by Hal Burch and Bill Cheswick. I have a poster of it in my office, and it looks to me at different times like a representation of a neural network or some type of coral or algal formation. According to the poster text, the graph shown "was created by plotting the shortest path between a networked computer in Murray Hill, New Jersey and the 100,121 networks listed in the global Internet register of Merit Network, Inc. The data were collected on January 1, 2000." More recent versions of the poster are available (http://www.peacockmaps.com), but this one remains for me an intriguing (and somewhat inscrutable) snapshot of the Internet at that time.

A recent article in Science News Online (http://www.sciencenews.org) states that researchers have discovered that "a remarkable diversity of complex networks" exhibit a common architecture. The article, "Sizing Up Complex Webs: Close or Far, Many Networks Look the Same" by Erica Klarreich, describes this common architecture as consisting of "a few major hubs with many connections and many minor nodes with only a few connections". According to the article, this similarity of structure is seen in at least "four types of complex networks: the World Wide Web, a network of actors who have been in films together, networks of proteins with links between those that can bind to each other, and networks of other cellular molecules with links between molecules involved in the same biochemical reactions."

In the World Wide Web, for example, the patterns of links between individual nodes are similar to the patterns of links between clusters of nodes, between clusters of clusters, etc. Researchers discovered these similarities by "zooming out" and looking at the networks from farther and farther away. The article goes on to say that understanding the architecture of complex networks is important in applications as diverse as protecting the World Wide Web from hacker attacks and designing drugs with minimal side effects.

Any tool that helps systems administrators see their systems more effectively is valuable in dealing with capacity planning, backup and recovery, and security problems. In this issue, John Ouellette describes a method of logging and graphing database size to facilitate capacity planning, and James Price provides an equation to help you predict the likelihood that your Unix backup tape will contain readable, usable data. James Pinson describes the "list" utility -- a variation of "ls" that not only lists files but provides a file description as well. I hope that these articles along with the tools and techniques presented elsewhere in this issue will help you visualize, understand, and manage your systems more effectively.

Sincerely yours,

Amber Ankerholz

Editor in Chief